Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from infofortech

    What's Hot

    The Best EDB to PST Conversion

    June 17, 2026

    Sony’s new LYTIA L910 camera sensor will turbocharge night shots and 4K capture on phones

    June 17, 2026

    105K Chrome Installs Linked to Adware and Fake Google Traffic

    June 17, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    InfoForTech
    • Home
    • Latest in Tech
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity
    • Innovation
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    InfoForTech
    Home»Cybersecurity»105K Chrome Installs Linked to Adware and Fake Google Traffic
    Cybersecurity

    105K Chrome Installs Linked to Adware and Fake Google Traffic

    InfoForTechBy InfoForTechJune 17, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    105K Chrome Installs Linked to Adware and Fake Google Traffic
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email


    Security researchers have uncovered a network of 152 Google Chrome extensions posing as live wallpaper and new-tab customization tools that secretly collected user information and generated fake web traffic to make money through advertising.

    The extensions, which featured popular themes ranging from anime characters and football stars to sports cars and video games, were spread across 38 different Chrome Web Store publisher accounts. Together, they amassed more than 105,000 installations, according to research from Socket’s Threat Research Team.

    The operation was linked to three backend brands: tabplugins[.]com, yowgames[.]com, and chromewallpaper[.]com. Researchers said the extensions were built from a shared codebase, suggesting they were part of a coordinated campaign rather than isolated projects.

    Privacy claims didn’t match reality

    One of the most troubling findings was the gap between what the extensions promised and what they actually did.

    On their Chrome Web Store pages, the extensions claimed not to collect or use user data. But Socket found that the privacy policies linked by the extensions told a different story.

    “Every listing declares on the Chrome Web Store that it will not collect or use user data, while the linked privacy policy admits the opposite: that the extensions log IP addresses, ISP, click counts, and referrers and share that data with Google AdSense, DoubleClick, and third-party ad partners,” Socket security researcher Kush Pandya said.

    According to the researchers, the extensions logged details such as IP addresses, browser types, internet service providers, timestamps, click activity, and information about users’ devices.

    Faking Google search traffic

    The campaign went beyond merely collecting hidden data. Researchers found that a subset of the extensions automatically opened web pages after installation, using tracking tags that made visits appear to come from Google’s unpaid search results.

    The uninstall process used a similar trick. Extensions sent users through a specially crafted Google redirect link designed to imitate a real click from Google Search. Socket said the goal was to manufacture the appearance of valuable organic traffic.

    “The visit is not a person who searched Google; it is the extension opening a tab on its own and stamping it ‘arrived from Google organic search,’” the company explained. “The uninstall ping goes a step further, wrapping the destination in the exact google.com/url format Google uses for real search-result clicks, including the signed ved and usg tokens, so the hit looks like a human clicking a Google result.”

    Researchers said this allowed the operators to disguise extension-generated traffic as genuine search traffic, potentially making their websites appear more popular and attractive to advertisers and affiliate programs.

    Must-read security coverage

    Hidden features raised more questions

    The investigation also uncovered a dormant capability that could delete IndexedDB databases accessible to the extension whenever its service worker started.

    In the current versions, researchers said the feature did not appear to erase anything important because the extensions stored their settings elsewhere. Even so, the capability was present across many of the extensions.

    Socket also found signs that some versions had been rushed into production. A few contained broken JavaScript files that prevented parts of their background logic from running, yet they still passed Chrome’s review process.

    A financially motivated operation

    The extensions did not inject advertisements into every website users visited, researchers said. Instead, they redirected users to websites controlled by the operators, where traffic could be monetized through advertising technologies and analytics tools.

    Socket described the campaign as a “financially motivated commercial adware and traffic-attribution-fraud affiliate operation.” The researchers added that the exact people behind the network remain unknown, although available indicators suggest the campaign may have originated in Turkey.

    What users should do

    Security researchers recommend that users immediately review their installed Chrome extensions and remove any unfamiliar wallpaper or new-tab tools.

    Users are also advised to:

    • Check Chrome’s extension manager for unknown add-ons.
    • Remove unused or suspicious extensions.
    • Review privacy policies of installed extensions.
    • Monitor browser behavior for unexpected new tabs or redirects.

    Also read: Google’s June Android system updates add new controls for WhatsApp backups, Play Protect checks, and password transfers.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    InfoForTech
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Telegram OSINT Investigation: Financial Crime Guide

    June 17, 2026

    Google Vertex AI SDK Flaw Let Attackers Hijack Model Uploads via Bucket Squatting

    June 17, 2026

    ShinyHunters Claims Council of Europe HR Data, Threatens Leak

    June 17, 2026

    Fake Microsoft Alerts Used to Deploy North Korean NarwhalRAT Malware

    June 16, 2026

    Threat Actor Demands $2M Ransom

    June 16, 2026

    Troy Hunt: Weekly Update 508

    June 15, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Advertisement
    Top Posts

    DoJ Disrupts 3 Million-Device IoT Botnets Behind Record 31.4 Tbps Global DDoS Attacks

    March 20, 202638 Views

    Microsoft is bringing an AI helper to Xbox consoles

    March 14, 202616 Views

    This is the tech that makes Volvo’s latest EV a major step forward

    January 24, 202616 Views

    Why Security Validation Is Becoming Agentic

    March 16, 202615 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Advertisement
    About Us
    About Us

    Our mission is to deliver clear, reliable, and up-to-date information about the technologies shaping the modern world. We focus on breaking down complex topics into easy-to-understand insights for professionals, enthusiasts, and everyday readers alike.

    We're accepting new partnerships right now.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube
    Most Popular

    DoJ Disrupts 3 Million-Device IoT Botnets Behind Record 31.4 Tbps Global DDoS Attacks

    March 20, 202638 Views

    Microsoft is bringing an AI helper to Xbox consoles

    March 14, 202616 Views

    This is the tech that makes Volvo’s latest EV a major step forward

    January 24, 202616 Views
    Categories
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity
    • Innovation
    • Latest in Tech
    © 2026 All Rights Reserved InfoForTech.
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.